The build enforces the compliance rule
A CI check fails the build if a new money-movement command is added without an identity gate, so the rule cannot rot.
Fintech + AI
A compliant wallet platform, live in six months
USD and crypto wallets with transfers, swaps and cash-out. Identity checks gate every money movement, and AML triage runs on a self-hosted LLM with a human making every decision.
- 6 mo
- to production
- 590
- test files
- 19
- domain modules
The business could launch a regulated product in six months instead of first assembling a compliance team, because identity checks and AML review are enforced by the system itself rather than by headcount.
// the problem
The problem
A wallet holding real money needed identity checks and anti-money-laundering review that regulators would accept, without a compliance team of fifty.
- No money movement may bypass identity verification
- Every AML decision must be made by a person, and be auditable
- Personal data must not leave the company's own infrastructure
// engineering
How we built it
AI triages, a human decides
A self-hosted model drafts the AML assessment with personal data redacted; a compliance officer approves or rejects every case.
Separate read and write paths
Balances and statements are served from projections, so reporting load never touches the money-movement path.
// result
Outcome
Live in six months with 590 test files, 90%+ unit coverage, and an audit trail that covers AI-assisted decisions as well as human ones.
Every money-movement command is gated by identity verification, and the build fails if a new one skips the gate.
Event-driven backend · Relational database · Message queue · Frontend application layer · Cloud-native infrastructure
30 minutes with a senior engineer.
Tell us what you're building. You'll leave with an honest opinion, even if it's "you don't need us."
Reference calls with past clients are available under NDA during evaluation.